Remax Properties v. Young
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-APR-2020 09:22 AM
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
REMAX PROPERTIES, authorized agent for RICHARD K. TAHARA and MARJORIE T. TAHARA, owners of the subject property, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT PUNA DIVISION
(CIVIL NO. 3RC-18-1-1186)
ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the document, filed March 12, 2020, by self-represented Defendant-Appellant Christopher Young (Young), which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order dismissing appeal (Motion), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) on February 28, 2020, the court dismissed the appeal for failure to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief; (2) in the instant Motion, Young seeks reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order; (3) a motion for reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order was due on or before March 9, 2020. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a); and (4) the
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
instant Motion, filed March 12, 2020, is untimely as a motion for reconsideration.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed as untimely.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 6, 2020.
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge
/s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Remax Properties v. Young (Remax Properties v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.