Relyea v. Relyea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Relyea v. Relyea

33 A.D.2d 860, 305 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2621

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 860 (Relyea v. Relyea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Relyea v. Relyea, 33 A.D.2d 860, 305 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from an order of Family Court which denied petitioner’s application for an order awarding custody of the daughter of the parties hereto or, in the alternative, increasing visitation privileges. From a reading of the present record it would appear that a change in visitation privileges was justified. However, the respondent admitted in his brief that since the order was made, there have been changes in the visitation privileges. We would further note that the mother at any time, for sufficient cause, may apply to the Family Court for additional or further visitation privileges. Order affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from an order of Family Court which denied petitioner’s application for an order awarding custody of the daughter of the parties hereto or, in the alternative, increasing visitation privileges. From a reading of the present record it would appear that a change in visitation privileges was justified. However, the respondent admitted in his brief that since the order was made, there have been changes in the visitation privileges. We would further note that the mother at any time, for sufficient cause, may apply to the Family Court for additional or further visitation privileges. Order affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 860, 305 N.Y.S.2d 768, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/relyea-v-relyea-nyappdiv-1969.