Rellick-Smith, S., Pet v. B. Rellick & K. Vasil
This text of Rellick-Smith, S., Pet v. B. Rellick & K. Vasil (Rellick-Smith, S., Pet v. B. Rellick & K. Vasil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
SHARLEEN M. RELLICK-SMITH, : No. 119 WAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : BETTY J. RELLICK AND KIMBERLY V. : VASIL, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
a. Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the Trial Court’s decision to allow the Respondents to file an amended answer to include the [affirmative] defense that the action was barred by the statute of limitations due to the issue having already been determined to be waived by the Trial Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rellick-Smith, S., Pet v. B. Rellick & K. Vasil, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rellick-smith-s-pet-v-b-rellick-k-vasil-pa-2020.