Reliford v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Reliford v. State

226 S.W.3d 901, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 952, 2007 WL 1814504

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reliford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1818 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 26, 2007·No. No. ED 88523·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ivan Reliford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ivan Reliford appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evi-dentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Reliford v. State, 226 S.W.3d 901, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 952, 2007 WL 1814504 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

226 S.W.3d 901 (Reliford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.