Reliance Trust Company v. Paxton Candler
This text of Reliance Trust Company v. Paxton Candler (Reliance Trust Company v. Paxton Candler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIRD DIVISION ELLINGTON, P. J., DOYLE, P.J. and MILLER J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
April 29, 2014
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A11A1807. RELIANCE TRUST CO. v. CANDLER et al.
MILLER, Judge.
In Reliance Trust Co. v. Candler, 294 Ga. 15 (751 SE2d 47) (2013), the
Supreme Court of Georgia reversed the judgment of this Court in Division 5 of
Reliance Trust Co. v. Candler, 315 Ga. App. 495 (726 SE2d 636) (2012), in which
this Court affirmed the award of prejudgment interest at the statutory rate from the
dates of each encroachment upon the corpus of the revocable marital trust created by
the wife of life beneficiary Charles Howard Candler III. Consequently, we vacate
Division 5 of our opinion in Reliance Trust, supra, 315 Ga. App. at 504 (5), and in
its place adopt the opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. We further remand this
case to the trial court with direction to withdraw that portion of the final judgment awarding interest, and to reenter an award of interest from the date of the life
beneficiary’s death.
The Supreme Court did not address or consider Divisions 1 - 4 of our earlier
opinion. Since those portions of our earlier opinion are consistent with the Supreme
Court’s opinion, those Divisions “become binding upon the return of the remittitur.”
Shadix v. Carroll County, 274 Ga. 560, 563 (1) (554 SE2d 465) (2001). Accordingly,
the trial court did not err in denying Reliance Trust’s motion for new trial with regard
to the jury’s award of damages to the remainder beneficiaries of the trust.
Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part with direction. Ellington, P.J.,
and Doyle, P.J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Reliance Trust Company v. Paxton Candler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reliance-trust-company-v-paxton-candler-gactapp-2014.