Reliance National Life Insurance Company v. Margaret Hackelman

372 F.2d 133, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7664
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 25, 1967·No. 21139_1·Published

Opinion

*134 PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff (appellee here) had no proof to spare, but we have concluded that there was an issue of fact which the district court could have decided either way. We affirm the judgment against the defendant (appellant) as not clearly erroneous.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reliance National Life Insurance Company v. Margaret Hackelman, 372 F.2d 133, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7664 (9th Cir. 1967).

372 F.2d 133 (Reliance National Life Insurance Company v. Margaret Hackelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.