Reliance Intercontinental Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Reliance Intercontinental Corp. v. United States

55 Cust. Ct. 454, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1640

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 6, 1965

DocketNo. 69580; protests 306149-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 55 Cust. Ct. 454 (Reliance Intercontinental Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reliance Intercontinental Corp. v. United States, 55 Cust. Ct. 454, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1640 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves or silk gloves, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 915, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), for cotton gloves and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 1208, as modified, supra, for silk gloves, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves or silk gloves, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 915, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), for cotton gloves and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 1208, as modified, supra, for silk gloves, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

55 Cust. Ct. 454, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reliance-intercontinental-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1965.