Reliance Federal Savings Bank v. Altman
This text of 269 A.D.2d 380 (Reliance Federal Savings Bank v. Altman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Laurie Altman, as Trustee of the Judith Eidelkind Trust, and the Trustees of the Judith Eidelkind Trust, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), dated June 23, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied their cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that this action was timely commenced. The loan documents provided that the acceleration of the mortgage debt was at the option of the mortgagee. The recovery of installments due within six years of the commencement of the instant action was not time-barred (see, Loiacono v Goldberg, 240 AD2d 476; Pagano v Smith, 201 AD2d 632, 633).
The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 380, 702 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reliance-federal-savings-bank-v-altman-nyappdiv-2000.