Relan v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Relan v. State

135 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 677

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 1931

Docket6 Div. 794.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 925 (Relan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Relan v. State, 135 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 677 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The corpus delicti was proven withput dispute, and the only question in dispute was the identity of defendant. On this question the evidence was in conflict. If the jury believed the evidence for the state beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant is guilty. The jury passed upon this evidence, and we cannot disturb the verdict.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The corpus delicti was proven withput dispute, and the only question in dispute was the identity of defendant. On this question the evidence was in conflict. If the jury believed the evidence for the state beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant is guilty. The jury passed upon this evidence, and we cannot disturb the verdict.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 925, 24 Ala. App. 677, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/relan-v-state-alactapp-1931.