Rekemeyer v. Empire Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rekemeyer v. Empire Mutual Insurance

33 A.D.2d 609, 304 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 609 (Rekemeyer v. Empire Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rekemeyer v. Empire Mutual Insurance, 33 A.D.2d 609, 304 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff in action No. 2 from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County, which granted the motion of the plaintiffs in action No. 1 for a joint trial of the two actions in Albany County. Both actions are for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of a cancellation of the addition of a vehicle used by Thomas D. Rekemeyer, a teenager, to the auto policy of Ann Marie Rekemeyer, his mother. We find advanced no cogent reason to disturb the discretion of Special Term in ordering a joint trial in Albany County (e.g., Kiamesha Concord v. Greenmail, 29 A D 2d 904). Barch v. Avco Corp. (30 A D 2d 241) is neither apposite nor controlling in the instant case. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff in action No. 2 from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County, which granted the motion of the plaintiffs in action No. 1 for a joint trial of the two actions in Albany County. Both actions are for a declaratory judgment to determine the validity of a cancellation of the addition of a vehicle used by Thomas D. Rekemeyer, a teenager, to the auto policy of Ann Marie Rekemeyer, his mother. We find advanced no cogent reason to disturb the discretion of Special Term in ordering a joint trial in Albany County (e.g., Kiamesha Concord v. Greenmail, 29 A D 2d 904). Barch v. Avco Corp. (30 A D 2d 241) is neither apposite nor controlling in the instant case. Order affirmed, with costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 609, 304 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rekemeyer-v-empire-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1969.