Reitzfeld v. Sobel
114 N.Y.S. 27
This text of 114 N.Y.S. 27 (Reitzfeld v. Sobel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reitzfeld v. Sobel, 114 N.Y.S. 27 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
The testimony given on the part of the plaintiff failed to show that she was hired for any definite period, and, as her right to recover for one month’s wages depended upon such proof, the judgment must be reversed. Frank v. Man. Mat. & Dis. (Sup.) 107 N. Y. Supp. 404.
Judgment reversed and new trial.ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Frank v. Manhattan Maternity & Dispensary
107 N.Y.S. 404 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 N.Y.S. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reitzfeld-v-sobel-nyappterm-1909.