Reitzer v. Medina Valley Irr. Co.

Fifth Circuit

Reitzer v. Medina Valley Irr. Co.

237 F. 1020, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2036

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 15, 1916·No. No. 2980·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By uncontradieted evidence, admitted on the trial without objection, it was shown that the defendants had estopped themselves to deny the right of the plaintiff to acquire the land in question by condemnation. This fact renders unavailable many of the assignments of error which have been insisted 'on in argument. Our examination of the record in the light of the arguments and briefs has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that any reversible error was committed. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By uncontradieted evidence, admitted on the trial without objection, it was shown that the defendants had estopped themselves to deny the right of the plaintiff to acquire the land in question by condemnation. This fact renders unavailable many of the assignments of error which have been insisted 'on in argument. Our examination of the record in the light of the arguments and briefs has led us to the conclusion that it does not show that any reversible error was committed. The judgment is affirmed.

Reitzer v. Medina Valley Irr. Co., 237 F. 1020, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2036 (5th Cir. 1916).

Pincite

237 F. 1020 (Reitzer v. Medina Valley Irr. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.