Reitz v. Shelton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reitz v. Shelton

213 A.D.2d 174, 624 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 174 (Reitz v. Shelton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reitz v. Shelton, 213 A.D.2d 174, 624 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered October 20, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion for, inter alia, renewal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly denied defendant-appellant’s motion to renew inasmuch as defendant failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the affidavits containing the additional facts to the court on its initial motion, despite the opportunities afforded defendant-appellant to do so (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kristin Booth Glen, J.), entered October 20, 1993, which denied defendant’s motion for, inter alia, renewal, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS Court properly denied defendant-appellant’s motion to renew inasmuch as defendant failed to offer a valid excuse for not submitting the affidavits containing the additional facts to the court on its initial motion, despite the opportunities afforded defendant-appellant to do so (Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 174, 624 N.Y.S.2d 806, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reitz-v-shelton-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack