Reiter v. Reiter

48 A.D.3d 661, 851 N.Y.S.2d 874
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reiter v. Reiter. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 A.D.3d 616

Opinion

In anaction to rescind provisions of a settlement agreement dated November 19, 2003, which was incorporated but not merged in the judgment of divorce entered June 30, 2004, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Baltin, J), dated October 30, 2006, as denied that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment rescinding the child support and maintenance provisions of the agreement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying that branch of her motion which was for summary judgment rescinding the child support and maintenance provisions of the parties’ settlement agreement (see generally McMains v McMains, 15 NY2d 283, 291 [1965]; Woods v Bard, 285 NY 11 [1941]; Rodgers v Rodgers, 235 NY 408 [1923]; Butler v Butler, 206 App Div 214 [1923]). Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Covello and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reiter v. Reiter, 48 A.D.3d 661, 851 N.Y.S.2d 874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

48 A.D.3d 661 (Reiter v. Reiter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rodgers v. . Rodgers
139 N.E. 557 (New York Court of Appeals, 1923)
Woods v. Bard
32 N.E.2d 772 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
Butler v. Butler
206 A.D. 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
McMains v. McMains
206 N.E.2d 185 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)