Reiter v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reiter v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14032

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.3d 349 (Reiter v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reiter v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14032 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about May 22, 2002, which denied petitioner employee’s application seeking, inter alia, to annul a negative evaluation of petitioner by his supervisor that was upheld after undergoing respondent employer’s appeal process, and directed entry of judgment dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s claim that respondent did not follow its own appeal process was waived by his failure to object to the alleged irregularities in the process at the time they were committed (see Matter of Kabnick v Chassin, 223 AD2d 935, 936 [1996], affd 89 NY2d 828 [1996]), or indeed at any time before the process had concluded. We have considered and rejected petitioner’s other arguments. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.), entered on or about May 22, 2002, which denied petitioner employee’s application seeking, inter alia, to annul a negative evaluation of petitioner by his supervisor that was upheld after undergoing respondent employer’s appeal process, and directed entry of judgment dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s claim that respondent did not follow its own appeal process was waived by his failure to object to the alleged irregularities in the process at the time they were committed (see Matter of Kabnick v Chassin, 223 AD2d 935, 936 [1996], affd 89 NY2d 828 [1996]), or indeed at any time before the process had concluded. We have considered and rejected petitioner’s other arguments. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 349, 768 N.Y.S.2d 815, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiter-v-metropolitan-transportation-authority-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack