Reiter v. City of New York

277 A.D.2d 986

This text of 277 A.D.2d 986 (Reiter v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reiter v. City of New York, 277 A.D.2d 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment setting aside the verdict of a jury in his favor and dismissing the complaint, and from an order amending said judgment. Judgment for defendant, and order, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, the verdict of the jury ordered to be reinstated, and judgment directed to be entered in accordance therewith, with costs. On the prior appeal (272 App. Div. 770) the existence of a question of fact was indicated, therefore a dismissal was erroneous. ■ Under all the circumstances, it was error to set aside the verdict of the jury. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiter-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1950.