Reitemeyer v. Marcalus

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Reitemeyer v. Marcalus

44 A.2d 25, 137 N.J. Eq. 174, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 419

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedSeptember 27, 1945

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 44 A.2d 25 (Reitemeyer v. Marcalus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reitemeyer v. Marcalus, 44 A.2d 25, 137 N.J. Eq. 174, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 419 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants, husband and wife, appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery ordering them specifically to perform a contract to sell real estate.

It appears from an examination of the state of case on this appeal and the motion papers heretofore filed in this court that the question is moot. The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

For modification — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Come, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellants, husband and wife, appeal from a decree of the Court of Chancery ordering them specifically to perform a contract to sell real estate.

It appears from an examination of the state of case on this appeal and the motion papers heretofore filed in this court that the question is moot. The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

For modification — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heiier, Perskie, Come, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, JJ. 12.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.2d 25, 137 N.J. Eq. 174, 1945 N.J. LEXIS 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reitemeyer-v-marcalus-nj-1945.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack