Reist v. Reist

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reist v. Reist

49 A. 951, 200 Pa. 317, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 490

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 17, 1901

DocketAppeal, No. 362

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A. 951 (Reist v. Reist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reist v. Reist, 49 A. 951, 200 Pa. 317, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 490 (Pa. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

The plaintiff asked the court to decline to submit the case to the jury but to reinstate the judgment with full force and effect, less amount realized at the sheriff’s sale, to wit: $58.77. The court refused this point. The judgment was opened by the court on testimony deemed sufficient, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $158.67. We cannot say that it was error to open the judgment and we therefore affirm it.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam,

The plaintiff asked the court to decline to submit the case to the jury but to reinstate the judgment with full force and effect, less amount realized at the sheriff’s sale, to wit: $58.77. The court refused this point. The judgment was opened by the court on testimony deemed sufficient, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $158.67. We cannot say that it was error to open the judgment and we therefore affirm it.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A. 951, 200 Pa. 317, 1901 Pa. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reist-v-reist-pa-1901.