Reiss v. Mackay
This text of 187 Misc. 360 (Reiss v. Mackay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum The proof of the landlords’ ownership of the premises is sufficient. The “ immediate and personal use ” required by subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Bent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd. by L. 1946, ch. 272) refers to use immediately upon removal of the tenant, not to use immediately upon acquiring title. The final order cannot be sustained upon the ground that the landlords failed to show good faith; from the record it appears that the court below did not pass upon that question.
The final order should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellants to abide the event.
Shientag, McLaughlin and Hecht, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 Misc. 360, 61 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiss-v-mackay-nyappterm-1946.