Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 1957·No. No. 34942·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and will not be substituted for an appeal. State, ex rel. Heine, v. Busher, Chief Justice, 164 Ohio St., 519, 132 N. E. (2d), 459.

Appellants have an adequate remedy by way of appeal.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WeygaNdt, C. J., Zimmermah, Stewart, Bell, Taft, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and will not be substituted for an appeal. State, ex rel. Heine, v. Busher, Chief Justice, 164 Ohio St., 519, 132 N. E. (2d), 459.

Appellants have an adequate remedy by way of appeal.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

WeygaNdt, C. J., Zimmermah, Stewart, Bell, Taft, Matthias and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court, 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178 (Ohio 1957).

Pincite

166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178 (Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.