Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court
166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178
This text of 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178 (Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Reiss v. Columbus Municipal Court, 166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178 (Ohio 1957).
Opinion
The writ of prohibition will be awarded only where there is no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and will not be substituted for an appeal. State, ex rel. Heine, v. Busher, Chief Justice, 164 Ohio St., 519, 132 N. E. (2d), 459.
Appellants have an adequate remedy by way of appeal.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
166 Ohio St. (N.S.) 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiss-v-columbus-municipal-court-ohio-1957.