Reiss v. Brady

2 Cal. 132
California Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1852·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.—Justice Heydenfeldt.

No cause for dissolving the attachment being disclosed by the record in this cause, the order to that effect made by the District Court is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reiss v. Brady, 2 Cal. 132 (Cal. 1852).

2 Cal. 132 (Reiss v. Brady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nail v. Superior Court
103 P. 902 (California Court of Appeal, 1909)
Newell v. Whitwell
40 P. 866 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)
Harmon Bros. v. Jenks
84 Ala. 74 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Williams v. Glasgow
1 Nev. 533 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)