Reisman v. Massey

58 S.E.2d 528, 81 Ga. App. 277, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reisman v. Massey. Read the opinion of the Court — 84 Ga. App. 796
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 17, 1950·No. 32840·Published

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. In an action for the breach of a written real-estate-brokerage contract, filed against a man and his wife as co-partners, where the contract sued on was under seal and was signed by only one of the defendants in her individual name, no legal recovery can be had against the partnership and a verdict found by the jury for the defendants will not be reversed because of alleged errors on the trial. No recovery may be had against a partnership for a breach of a contract signed by one of the partners as an individual obligation only, where the other is not stricken by amendment. Doody Co. v. Jeffcoat, 127 Ga. 301 (56 S. E. 421); Code, § 81-1306. Only parties to sealed instruments may sue or be sued thereon. Hollingsworth v. Georgia Fruit Growers, 185 Ga. 873 (196 S. E. 766).

The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Sutton, C. J., and Worrill, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reisman v. Massey, 58 S.E.2d 528, 81 Ga. App. 277, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 878 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).

58 S.E.2d 528 (Reisman v. Massey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doody Co. v. Jeffcoat
56 S.E. 421 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Hollingsworth v. Georgia Fruit Growers Inc.
196 S.E. 766 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)