Reisman v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reisman v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center

57 A.D.2d 589, 393 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 589 (Reisman v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reisman v. Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, 57 A.D.2d 589, 393 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 14, 1976, which denied their motion, inter alia, for discovery of certain hospital records and certain facts relating thereto, after a statement of readiness had been filed. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In February, 1976 the deposition of defendant Dr. Albert Greenwood was taken and, on or about February 17, 1976, a statement of readiness was served. An order granting plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint so as to add a cause of action for lack of informed consent was made on October 29, 1976. The conditions here presented are not those envisioned by rule 675.7 of this court, which provides when further disclosure may be allowed after an action has been placed on the calendar (22 NYCRR 675.7). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 14, 1976, which denied their motion, inter alia, for discovery of certain hospital records and certain facts relating thereto, after a statement of readiness had been filed. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. In February, 1976 the deposition of defendant Dr. Albert Greenwood was taken and, on or about February 17, 1976, a statement of readiness was served. An order granting plaintiffs’ motion to amend the complaint so as to add a cause of action for lack of informed consent was made on October 29, 1976. The conditions here presented are not those envisioned by rule 675.7 of this court, which provides when further disclosure may be allowed after an action has been placed on the calendar (22 NYCRR 675.7). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 589, 393 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reisman-v-columbia-presbyterian-medical-center-nyappdiv-1977.