Reisinger v. Salmon
This text of 277 A.D.2d 929 (Reisinger v. Salmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal oy defendant from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $9,750 in a negligence action, entered upon the verdict of a jury after a trial in the Supreme Court, Schenectady County, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Appellant was a general contractor engaged in remodeling a building in the city of Schenectady. Plaintiff was an employee of an electrical contractor engaged in installing electrical equipment under a separate contract. Under the direction of appellant a hole was cut in one of the walls for the purpose of making a window. The jury could have found that this operation loosened an I-beam and caused a partial collapse of the building, and also that appellant did not exercise reasonable care in examining the support of the I-beam before the cutting was commenced. To escape falling debris plaintiff ran and fell into a deep pit, thereby sustaining the injuries complained of. There is medical testimony to support a finding that he suffered a permanent injury to his back. The case was fairly submitted to the jury, and only questions of fact are involved. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Present — Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Deyo and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reisinger-v-salmon-nyappdiv-1950.