Reisinger v. Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reisinger v. Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District

57 A.D.2d 868, 394 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 868 (Reisinger v. Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reisinger v. Board of Education of the Yonkers City School District, 57 A.D.2d 868, 394 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondents to (1) accord petitioners their proper seniority credits for purposes of layoffs and (2) reinstate them if teachers with less seniority have been retained, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 2, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioners were part-time teachers at their own request. It cannot be said that the failure to grant them credit, for seniority purposes, for such part-time service was illegal, arbitrary or capricious. In view of our determination, we do not reach the question of the applicability of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law to the fact pattern here. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondents to (1) accord petitioners their proper seniority credits for purposes of layoffs and (2) reinstate them if teachers with less seniority have been retained, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 2, 1976, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Petitioners were part-time teachers at their own request. It cannot be said that the failure to grant them credit, for seniority purposes, for such part-time service was illegal, arbitrary or capricious. In view of our determination, we do not reach the question of the applicability of subdivision 1 of section 3813 of the Education Law to the fact pattern here. Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 868, 394 N.Y.S.2d 245, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reisinger-v-board-of-education-of-the-yonkers-city-school-district-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack