Reising v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Reising v. State

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173, 1975 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 27

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedDecember 12, 1975

DocketNo. 75-1295

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173 (Reising v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reising v. State, 31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173, 1975 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 27 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This claim arose as the Claimant was improperly discharged. He was discharged January 11, 1974, and rehired on July 27, 1974. The first Civil Service Commission hearing was scheduled March 1, .1974, and was continued at the request of the Claimant’s attorney. The hearing was held on May 24, 1974. The department does not have to pay Mr. Reising’s back salary for the period the hearing was continued at his attorney’s request. From May 1 through May 24, 1974, Mr. Reising was paid $480.00 in unemployment compensation. However, the amount claimed ($480.00) was originally erroneously withheld as a set-off for unemployment compensation received during the period of unemployment, while in truth the original payment for back salary did not include payment for the period of time represented by the unemployment compensation which was set off. Therefore, there are no deductions to be withheld from the amount herein awarded.

It is, therefore, ordered that Claimant be and is hereby awarded Four Hundred Eighty Dollars ($480.00).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This claim arose as the Claimant was improperly discharged. He was discharged January 11, 1974, and rehired on July 27, 1974. The first Civil Service Commission hearing was scheduled March 1, .1974, and was continued at the request of the Claimant’s attorney. The hearing was held on May 24, 1974. The department does not have to pay Mr. Reising’s back salary for the period the hearing was continued at his attorney’s request. From May 1 through May 24, 1974, Mr. Reising was paid $480.00 in unemployment compensation. However, the amount claimed ($480.00) was originally erroneously withheld as a set-off for unemployment compensation received during the period of unemployment, while in truth the original payment for back salary did not include payment for the period of time represented by the unemployment compensation which was set off. Therefore, there are no deductions to be withheld from the amount herein awarded.

It is, therefore, ordered that Claimant be and is hereby awarded Four Hundred Eighty Dollars ($480.00).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ill. Ct. Cl. 173, 1975 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reising-v-state-ilclaimsct-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack