Reisha Bernard v. Southfork Lake LLC Dba Southfork Lake

Opinion

Opinion issued February 13, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

Moreover, appellant has neither paid the required filing fee nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.

GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Fees Charged in the Supreme

Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on

Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26, 2024). After

being notified by letter issued on October 9, 2024 that this appeal was subject to

dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing

enforcement of rule), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3, 43.2(f). Any

pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Johnson, and Dokupil.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-24-00707-CV ——————————— REISHA BERNARD, Appellant V. SOUTHFORK LAKE LLC DBA SOUTHFORK LAKE, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 & Probate Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. CI67642 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on November 7, 2024. On November 15, 2024, the Court issued a notice that the appeal might be dismissed unless appellant filed a brief within 10 days of the date of the notice. Appellant did not respond.