Reinoehl's Estate

61 A. 943, 212 Pa. 359, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 616
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 22, 1905
DocketAppeal, No. 246
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 61 A. 943 (Reinoehl's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinoehl's Estate, 61 A. 943, 212 Pa. 359, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 616 (Pa. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Advancement is always a question of intention to be determined by what took place at the time and, in the absence of evidence as to this, by the attendant circumstances. The auditor found both from the declarations of the parent made at the time and from the surrounding circumstances that an advancement and not a gift or loan was intended. This finding, approved by the court, we should not disturb unless convinced that it was plainly erroneous. We find nothing in the testimony that leads us to doubt its correctness.

The decree of the court is affirmed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston Estate
119 A.2d 304 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1956)
Brahm's Estate
112 A. 21 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Estate of Spreckels
6 Coffey 375 (California Superior Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A. 943, 212 Pa. 359, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinoehls-estate-pa-1905.