Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.

267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876

This text of 267 A.D. 981 (Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp., 267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

Orders, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Untermyer and Dore, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify the orders appealed from by denying the motion to dismiss the second, third, fourth and fifth defenses, and, as so modified, to affirm. (Morgan Munitions Co. v. Studebaker Corp., 226 N. Y. 94, 98; Staten Island M. R. R. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 473, 481; Home Insurance Co. v. Gillespie Loading Co., 222 App. Div. 67, 68; 3 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading [3d ed.], note, p. 2394. [See 268 App. Div. 755.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of America
123 N.E. 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Staten Island Midland Railroad v. Hinchliffe
63 N.E. 545 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Home Insurance v. T. A. Gillespie Loading Co.
222 A.D. 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinlib-v-memo-leather-goods-corp-nyappdiv-1944.