Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.
This text of 267 A.D. 981 (Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Untermyer and Dore, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify the orders appealed from by denying the motion to dismiss the second, third, fourth and fifth defenses, and, as so modified, to affirm. (Morgan Munitions Co. v. Studebaker Corp., 226 N. Y. 94, 98; Staten Island M. R. R. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 473, 481; Home Insurance Co. v. Gillespie Loading Co., 222 App. Div. 67, 68; 3 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading [3d ed.], note, p. 2394. [See 268 App. Div. 755.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinlib-v-memo-leather-goods-corp-nyappdiv-1944.