Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.

267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876

Opinion

Orders, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Untermyer and Dore, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify the orders appealed from by denying the motion to dismiss the second, third, fourth and fifth defenses, and, as so modified, to affirm. (Morgan Munitions Co. v. Studebaker Corp., 226 N. Y. 94, 98; Staten Island M. R. R. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 473, 481; Home Insurance Co. v. Gillespie Loading Co., 222 App. Div. 67, 68; 3 Abbott’s Forms of Pleading [3d ed.], note, p. 2394. [See 268 App. Div. 755.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp., 267 A.D. 981, 48 N.Y.S.2d 800, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 981 (Reinlib v. Memo Leather Goods Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of America
123 N.E. 146 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)
Staten Island Midland Railroad v. Hinchliffe
63 N.E. 545 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Home Insurance v. T. A. Gillespie Loading Co.
222 A.D. 67 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)