Reinholdt v. Alberti

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reinholdt v. Alberti

1 Binn. 469, 1808 Pa. LEXIS 69

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 31, 1808

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 1 Binn. 469 (Reinholdt v. Alberti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reinholdt v. Alberti, 1 Binn. 469, 1808 Pa. LEXIS 69 (Pa. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We have no doubt. If the attorney has done wrong, he is answerable for it. But undoubtedly b) the practice of Pennsylvania, the authority of the defendant’s attorney is competent to restore an action after non pros. The authority of an attorney is not limited here in the same manner that it is in England. For a payment to the plaintiff’s attorney, long after judgment, and without execution, has been held good upon argument. Let the rule be discharged.

Rule discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We have no doubt. If the attorney has done wrong, he is answerable for it. But undoubtedly b) the practice of Pennsylvania, the authority of the defendant’s attorney is competent to restore an action after non pros. The authority of an attorney is not limited here in the same manner that it is in England. For a payment to the plaintiff’s attorney, long after judgment, and without execution, has been held good upon argument. Let the rule be discharged.

Rule discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Binn. 469, 1808 Pa. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinholdt-v-alberti-pa-1808.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack