Reinhaus v. Patrick

133 A. 923, 4 N.J. Misc. 457, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 7, 1926
StatusPublished

This text of 133 A. 923 (Reinhaus v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinhaus v. Patrick, 133 A. 923, 4 N.J. Misc. 457, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1926).

Opinion

Pee Ctteiam.

This suit was brought in the Bayonne District Court to recover damages for injury to an automobile caused by a collision with the defendant’s automobile on the 13th of September, 1925, on Broadway and Sixteenth street, Bayonne. The defendant filed a counter-claim. The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff for $500. The questions involved were questions of fact. We find no reversible error in the record in admitting alleged illegal evidence under the case of Hintz v. Roberts, 98 N. J. L. 769, or in giving judgment for $500 for the plaintiff. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A. 923, 4 N.J. Misc. 457, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinhaus-v-patrick-nj-1926.