Reinhart v. Borough of South Easton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Reinhart v. Borough of South Easton

2 Sadler 90

DecidedMarch 22, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Sadler 90 (Reinhart v. Borough of South Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reinhart v. Borough of South Easton, 2 Sadler 90 (Pa. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It is now well-settled law that a mere scintilla of evidence of a material fact does not justify a judge in leaving it to the jury. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Yerger, 73 Pa. 121, and cases there cited.

A careful examination of the evidence fails to disclose any substantial variance from that shown when the case was here before. South Easton v. Reinhart, 13 W. N. C. 389.

We see no reason to change the conclusion at which we then arrived.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI