Reinhardt v. Lehman

252 A.D. 771, 298 N.Y.S. 970, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reinhardt v. Lehman. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 A.D. 764

Opinion

In an action against a receiver in foreclosure to recover for personal injuries sustained by falling ceiling plaster, judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The action does not lie against the receiver. (Woman’s Hospital v. Loubern Realty Corp., 266 N. Y. 123; Horan v. O’Reilly, 245 App. Div. 761.) Moreover, we are persuaded that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, and even if the receiver were liable in law, there would have to be a reversal and a new trial. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reinhardt v. Lehman, 252 A.D. 771, 298 N.Y.S. 970, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6239 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

252 A.D. 771 (Reinhardt v. Lehman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woman's Hospital v. Loubern Realty Corp.
194 N.E. 56 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Horan v. O'Reilly
245 A.D. 761 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)