Reinhardt v. Lehman
This text of 252 A.D. 771 (Reinhardt v. Lehman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action against a receiver in foreclosure to recover for personal injuries sustained by falling ceiling plaster, judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. The action does not lie against the receiver. (Woman’s Hospital v. Loubern Realty Corp., 266 N. Y. 123; Horan v. O’Reilly, 245 App. Div. 761.) Moreover, we are persuaded that the verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, and even if the receiver were liable in law, there would have to be a reversal and a new trial. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 771, 298 N.Y.S. 970, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinhardt-v-lehman-nyappdiv-1937.