Reinex v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Reinex v. State

8 N.W. 155, 51 Wis. 152, 1881 Wisc. LEXIS 40

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1881

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 8 N.W. 155 (Reinex v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reinex v. State, 8 N.W. 155, 51 Wis. 152, 1881 Wisc. LEXIS 40 (Wis. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

Lxoisr, J.

In a proceeding in the circuit court against the plaintiff in error under R. S., ch. 64, judgmenf of affiliation was entered against him. He has sued out a writ of error from this court to obtain a review of such judgment, and now moves the court to grant a stay of execution. The power of this court to grant a stay of the execution of judgment in a criminal case, pending a writ of error, is undoubted; and it is conferred upon a justice of the court by statute (R. S., 1102, sec. 4724). The trial court has the same power, however, and we think, as a general rule, the application should be made to the latter court. That court is cognizant of the whole case, and is the better qualified to determine whether there should be any delay of execution. At any rate, no stay will be granted here, unless for very cogent reasons. No reason is assigned in the motion papers for the interference of this court in the present case. Motions of this character have been heretofore granted by the justices of this court, somewhat unadvisedly, without any showing of special reasons for granting them, and the orders have not been challenged; but, upon due deliberation, we have reached the conclusion that the practice is a vicious one. Hereafter thp rule above indicated will be observed.

By the Court.' — Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lxoisr, J.

In a proceeding in the circuit court against the plaintiff in error under R. S., ch. 64, judgmenf of affiliation was entered against him. He has sued out a writ of error from this court to obtain a review of such judgment, and now moves the court to grant a stay of execution. The power of this court to grant a stay of the execution of judgment in a criminal case, pending a writ of error, is undoubted; and it is conferred upon a justice of the court by statute (R. S., 1102, sec. 4724). The trial court has the same power, however, and we think, as a general rule, the application should be made to the latter court. That court is cognizant of the whole case, and is the better qualified to determine whether there should be any delay of execution. At any rate, no stay will be granted here, unless for very cogent reasons. No reason is assigned in the motion papers for the interference of this court in the present case. Motions of this character have been heretofore granted by the justices of this court, somewhat unadvisedly, without any showing of special reasons for granting them, and the orders have not been challenged; but, upon due deliberation, we have reached the conclusion that the practice is a vicious one. Hereafter thp rule above indicated will be observed.

By the Court.' — Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.W. 155, 51 Wis. 152, 1881 Wisc. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinex-v-state-wis-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack