Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad

66 Misc. 229, 122 N.Y.S. 998
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 66 Misc. 229 (Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinertsen v. Erie Railroad, 66 Misc. 229, 122 N.Y.S. 998 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1910).

Opinion

Putnam, J.

This is a motion for a preference, but not made till February 14, 1910, after the case had been noticed for the December, 1909, term of this court. The preference is sought upon the ground that the plaintiff is ill with a progressive disease and will probably not survive the trial of the action, if he is compelled to wait until it is reached in its regular order upon the calendar; and it is urged that the cause he preferred, not only over the issues for the December term, hut also over issues upon preceding calendars awaiting trial.

It is clearly established that, in this county, applications [230]*230for a preference, made upon any of the grounds enumerated in section 791 of the Code of Civil Procedure, under the provisions of section 793 must he. made at the beginning .of the term for which the notice of trial is served, and the failure to make the motion at that time operates as a waiver of the statutory right to a preference. Marks v. Murphy, 27 App. Div. 160; Meyerson v. Levy, 117 id. 475; Gegan v. Union Trust Co., 120 id. 382; Cohen v. Ransom, 63 Misc. Rep. 378. These Code provisions are not, however, exclusive. The court may make special rules of practice by which preferences may he allowed for causes not provided for in the Code, and as to which preferences the special rules themselves govern. Cohen v. Ransom, supra, 379. The court has inherent power and authority, in a proper case, aside from the statutory provisions, to grant a preference (Schuman v. Brooklyn Heights R. R. Co., 71 N. Y. Supp. 1095, 1096; affd. without opinion, 64 App. Div. 620); and it is recognized in the Schuman case that there are from time to time cases that should be preferred out of their order, and over earlier issues, though upon previous calendars, i. e. * * * where there is danger of the death of a party.”

The present application, addressed to the discretion of the court, is one in which the preference should he granted. The action, being for personal injuries, abates on the death óf the plaintiff. The moving papers contain an affidavit of a physician, which sets forth that he had examined the plaintiff on February 4, 1910; that he found him suffering from a disease of a tubercular character; that the disease is a progressive one from which plaintiff cannot recover, and that it is of such a character that, in his opinion, it will cause" the plaintiff to grow weaker and will cause his death within four months, if not earlier. On the other hand, there is nothing to indicate that a speedy trial of the case will, in any way, prejudice the rights of the defendant.

The motion for the preference is accordingly granted, and the clerk is ordered to place the cause on the ready calendar of this court for the 14th day of March, 1910, for trial.

- Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bermudez
84 Misc. 2d 1071 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Plachte v. Bancroft Inc.
3 A.D.2d 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Holdridge v. Calder
150 Misc. 142 (New York Supreme Court, 1933)
Clarke v. Eighth Avenue Railroad
114 Misc. 707 (New York Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Misc. 229, 122 N.Y.S. 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinertsen-v-erie-railroad-nysupct-1910.