Reinert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Reinert v. State

1912 OK CR 333, 123 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 735, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 16, 1912

DocketNo. A-1328.

StatusPublished

This text of 1912 OK CR 333 (Reinert v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Reinert v. State, 1912 OK CR 333, 123 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 735, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194 (Okla. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURlAM.

Jake Reinert, plaintiff in error, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and was on the 22nd day of May, 1911, sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to serve a term of six months in the county jail, and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and stand committed until such fine is satisfied according to law. The proof on the part of the prosecution shows that defendant was found in possession of intoxicating liquors at his place of business, 125 West California street, Oklahoma City, and proof of the payment by the defendant of. the special tax required of retail liquor dealers by the United States, by a certified copy, of the records of the collector of internal revenue for the district of Oklahoma, was made. There was no evidence offered on the part of the defendant. Prom an examination of the record and transcript our conclusion is that the appeal in this-case is wholly destitute of merit. The judgment of the ncounty court of Oklahoma county is therefore affirmed and the cause remanded thereto forthwith with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURlAM.

Jake Reinert, plaintiff in error, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquors with intent to sell the same, and was on the 22nd day of May, 1911, sentenced in accordance with the verdict of the jury to serve a term of six months in the county jail, and to pay a fine of five hundred dollars and stand committed until such fine is satisfied according to law. The proof on the part of the prosecution shows that defendant was found in possession of intoxicating liquors at his place of business, 125 West California street, Oklahoma City, and proof of the payment by the defendant of. the special tax required of retail liquor dealers by the United States, by a certified copy, of the records of the collector of internal revenue for the district of Oklahoma, was made. There was no evidence offered on the part of the defendant. Prom an examination of the record and transcript our conclusion is that the appeal in this-case is wholly destitute of merit. The judgment of the ncounty court of Oklahoma county is therefore affirmed and the cause remanded thereto forthwith with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1912 OK CR 333, 123 P. 1133, 7 Okla. Crim. 735, 1912 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinert-v-state-oklacrimapp-1912.