Reinert v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation

363 A.2d 1337, 26 Pa. Commw. 283, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1303
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedSeptember 29, 1976
DocketNo. 137 C.D. 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 363 A.2d 1337 (Reinert v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinert v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 363 A.2d 1337, 26 Pa. Commw. 283, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1303 (Pa. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

Marian J. Reinert and Robert L. Mitch, respectively the Administratrices of the Estates of Audrey S. Reinert and Yield. L. Mitch, both deceased, have filed a Complaint in Trespass in this Court against Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, alleging that the Department was negligent in the matter of the design and construction of Legislative Route 100 at a location in Chester County and in failing to provide notice of alleged dangerous conditions, the only such condition specified being the absence of a guard rail separating the North and South bound lanes of the road. The Commonwealth, by its Department of Transportation, has filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer grounded on the Comm on - wealth’s immunity from the suit.

The plaintiffs reiterate the familiar arguments against the Pennsylvania courts’ continued recognition of the so-called doctrine of sovereign immunity, despite our Supreme Court’s continued recognition of the viability of the doctrine by reason particularly of Article I, Section 11 of this State’s constitution. Specter v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 462 Pa. 474, 341 A.2d 481 (1975).

We assume that the plaintiffs, as they have the undoubted right to do, wish to raise the issue again [285]*285in the Supreme Court. This Court must, however, sustain the Commonwealth’s preliminary objections.

Order

And Now, this 29th day of September, 1976, it is ordered that the preliminary objections of the Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, in the nature of a demurrer be and they are hereby sustained and the complaint herein is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patterson v. Wilson ex rel. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
382 A.2d 1000 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Staley v. Commonwealth
380 A.2d 515 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Leonard v. Commonwealth
377 A.2d 1299 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Grieser v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
373 A.2d 1187 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
McElwee v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
373 A.2d 1163 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Tokar v. Commonwealth
371 A.2d 537 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways
363 A.2d 1329 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
REINERT v. PennDOT
363 A.2d 1337 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
363 A.2d 1337, 26 Pa. Commw. 283, 1976 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinert-v-pennsylvania-department-of-transportation-pacommwct-1976.