Reiners v. St. Ceran
This text of 23 La. Ann. 384 (Reiners v. St. Ceran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was before this court in 1867 and was remanded to give the defendant an opportunity to plead payment. 19 An. 207. It is evident from the decree then rendered that this plea of payment was allowed to be filed as a peremptory exception, which admitted the claim of the plaintiff to be correct, and alleged that it had been extinguished by payment.
On the second trial the court again gave judgment in favor of plaintiff for the balance claimed, and the defendant has again appealed. Instead of confining his defense to the peijmitted issue, which admits tho claim of plaintiff to be correctly set forth in his petition, and alleges its payment, he now attempts to obscure the case by raising points which have no merit. His plea of payment, at which alone it is necessary to look, is not established.
Judgment affirmed.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 La. Ann. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiners-v-st-ceran-la-1871.