Reiner v. Galinger

151 A.D. 711, 136 N.Y.S. 205, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 28, 1912·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Miller, J.:

The action is brought to have a past due note adjudged to be usurious, illegal and void. The mere fact that one has a defense to an action at law, if one should, be brought, has never yet been held to justify an appeal to the jurisdiction of equity.- The objection is not merely that there- is an adequate remedy at law, but that there is no cause of action.

Section 373 of the General Business Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 20; Laws of 1909, chap. 25), derived from section 5 of title 3 of chapter 4 of part 2 of the Revised Statutes (1 R. S. 772) and chapter 430 of the Laws of 1837, might upon a superficial reading seem to support the plaintiff’s right to maintain a suit to have the note adjudged to be void, but the law is settled in this State to the contrary. (Minturn v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 3 N. Y. 498; Allerton v. Belden, 49 id. 373.)

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, arid the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, and Dowling, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reiner v. Galinger, 151 A.D. 711, 136 N.Y.S. 205, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

151 A.D. 711 (Reiner v. Galinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reel v. Porcella
263 A.D. 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Crusins v. Siegman
81 Misc. 367 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)
Hager v. Arland
81 Misc. 421 (New York Supreme Court, 1913)
Gorham v. Galinger
154 A.D. 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)