Reiner v. Galinger
This text of 151 A.D. 711 (Reiner v. Galinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The action is brought to have a past due note adjudged to be usurious, illegal and void. The mere fact that one has a defense to an action at law, if one should, be brought, has never yet been held to justify an appeal to the jurisdiction of equity.- The objection is not merely that there- is an adequate remedy at law, but that there is no cause of action.
Section 373 of the General Business Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 20; Laws of 1909, chap. 25), derived from section 5 of title 3 of chapter 4 of part 2 of the Revised Statutes (1 R. S. 772) and chapter 430 of the Laws of 1837, might upon a superficial reading seem to support the plaintiff’s right to maintain a suit to have the note adjudged to be void, but the law is settled in this State to the contrary. (Minturn v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., 3 N. Y. 498; Allerton v. Belden, 49 id. 373.)
The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, arid the motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott, and Dowling, JJ., concurred.
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A.D. 711, 136 N.Y.S. 205, 1912 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiner-v-galinger-nyappdiv-1912.