Reineman & Co. v. C., C. & B. R. Co.
51 Iowa 338
Opinion
— By contract the defendant was to unload the lumber. It did unload it, and by unloading it upon the levee it adopted that place for its deposit. ' No further act was to be done by the intervenors. Nothing was wanting, then, to constitute a delivery. A delivery having been made, the intervenors’ lien was lost.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reineman & Co. v. C., C. & B. R. Co., 51 Iowa 338 (iowa 1879).
51 Iowa 338 (Reineman & Co. v. C., C. & B. R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lembeck v. Jarvis Terminal Cold Storage Co.
59 A. 360 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1904)
Gregg v. Illinois Central Railroad
35 N.E. 343 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1893)
Hanchett v. First National Bank
25 Ill. App. 274 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1888)