Reine v. Reine

129 So. 364, 170 La. 839, 1926 La. LEXIS 2412
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 5, 1926
DocketNo. 27915.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 129 So. 364 (Reine v. Reine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reine v. Reine, 129 So. 364, 170 La. 839, 1926 La. LEXIS 2412 (La. 1926).

Opinions

O’NIELL, Ó. J.

The defendants have moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal on the ground that the appeal bond was filed too late. The judgment was signed on the 10th 'of March, and the appeal bond was filed on the 22d. Two Sundays, the 14th and the 21st of March, intervened between the day on which the judgment was signed and the day on which the bond was filed. Therefore, only nine legal days elapsed, and the bond was filed on the tenth legal day, after the judgment was signed. In computing the ten days that are allowed for taking a suspensive appeal, the day on which the judgment is signed (or the day on which notice of judgment is served in the cases where such notice is required) and the day on which the appeal bond is filed are excluded from the count. Sundays also are excluded. Article 575 of the Code of Practice declares that, if the appeal be taken within ten days, not including Sundays, after notice of the judgment has been served upon the party cast, when such notice is required by law to be given, it shall stay execution "and all further proceedings until a final judgment is rendered on the appeal. If the calculation in this case disclosed, as the appellees contend, that the appeal bond was filed two days too late for a suspensive appeal it would not stay execution of the judgment, but the appeal would be nevertheless a valid appeal. Counting the 11th of March as the first of the ten days that were allowed for the taking of a suspensive appeal, however, the bond was filed on the last one of the ten legal days allowed, and was therefore filed within the ten days that were allowed for the taking of the suspensive appeal.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blalock v. Blalock
259 So. 2d 367 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1972)
Succession of Hollier
158 So. 2d 351 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Spencer v. West
126 So. 2d 423 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)
Succession of Hemenway
83 So. 2d 377 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1955)
Succession of Schnitter
56 So. 2d 563 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1951)
Guilbeau v. Guilbeau
46 So. 2d 282 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1950)
Cameron v. Rowland
40 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1948)
Thompson v. Jones
8 So. 2d 286 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1942)
Succession of Provost
181 So. 802 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)
Pellachino v. Cryer
157 So. 770 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Kelly, Weber & Co. v. F. D. Harvey & Co.
151 So. 201 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Houghton v. Hall
148 So. 37 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1933)
Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. Hunter
137 So. 904 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 364, 170 La. 839, 1926 La. LEXIS 2412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reine-v-reine-la-1926.