Reinchild v. State
This text of 139 N.E. 673 (Reinchild v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
From a judgment upon a verdict of guilty, under a charge of possessing intoxicating liquor (Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921), appellant appeals and claims error, in the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit.
On the authority of Crabbs v. State (1923), ante 248, and Powell v. State (1923), ante 258, the judgment is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to sustain the motion to quash.
Ewbank, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 N.E. 673, 193 Ind. 702, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinchild-v-state-ind-1923.