Reinchild v. State
139 N.E. 673, 193 Ind. 702, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 140
Opinion
From a judgment upon a verdict of guilty, under a charge of possessing intoxicating liquor (Acts 1921 p. 736, §8356d Burns’ Supp. 1921), appellant appeals and claims error, in the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit.
On the authority of Crabbs v. State (1923), ante 248, and Powell v. State (1923), ante 258, the judgment is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to sustain the motion to quash.
Ewbank, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reinchild v. State, 139 N.E. 673, 193 Ind. 702, 1923 Ind. LEXIS 140 (Ind. 1923).
139 N.E. 673 (Reinchild v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. State
142 N.E. 16 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)
Dressler v. State
141 N.E. 801 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1923)