Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Reinberg v. Reinberg

Reinberg v. Reinberg

802 So. 2d 423, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17106, 2001 WL 1539018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 2001
DocketNo. 3D01-2512
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 423 (Reinberg v. Reinberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Reinberg v. Reinberg, 802 So. 2d 423, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17106, 2001 WL 1539018 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals a non-final order denying her motion for her former husband to post a bond to secure his obligation to make future alimony payments. Although the former wife established a need for the security, there was competent substantial evidence presented that the former husband did not have the present ability to provide the same. See Dziuba v. Dziuba, 784 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA [424]*4242001). Accordingly, on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the former wife’s motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dziuba v. Dziuba
784 So. 2d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 423, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17106, 2001 WL 1539018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reinberg-v-reinberg-fladistctapp-2001.