Reinberg v. Reinberg

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Reinberg v. Reinberg

802 So. 2d 423, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17106, 2001 WL 1539018

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 2001·No. No. 3D01-2512·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals a non-final order denying her motion for her former husband to post a bond to secure his obligation to make future alimony payments. Although the former wife established a need for the security, there was competent substantial evidence presented that the former husband did not have the present ability to provide the same. See Dziuba v. Dziuba, 784 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA [424]*4242001). Accordingly, on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the former wife’s motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals a non-final order denying her motion for her former husband to post a bond to secure his obligation to make future alimony payments. Although the former wife established a need for the security, there was competent substantial evidence presented that the former husband did not have the present ability to provide the same. See Dziuba v. Dziuba, 784 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA [424]*4242001). Accordingly, on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the former wife’s motion.

Affirmed.

Reinberg v. Reinberg, 802 So. 2d 423, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17106, 2001 WL 1539018 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

802 So. 2d 423 (Reinberg v. Reinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related