Reina v. Metropolitan Dade County
304 So. 2d 101, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4118
Opinions
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1973). Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby
Discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Reina v. Metropolitan Dade County, 304 So. 2d 101, 1974 Fla. LEXIS 4118 (Fla. 1974).
304 So. 2d 101 (Reina v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manrique v. Bob's Plumbing Co.
573 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Sunshine Security & Detective Agency v. Wells Fargo Armored Services Corp.
496 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Perez v. Zazo
498 So. 2d 463 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Metropolitan Dade County v. Berek
379 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Martin v. United SEC. Services, Inc.
373 So. 2d 720 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Jax Liquors, Inc. v. Hall
344 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)