Rein v. Prescott

149 A.D.2d 982, 543 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6067

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Defendant’s papers in support of the motion for summary judgment consist of an attorney’s affidavit, the pleadings, plaintiffs’ bill of particulars, and doctor and medical reports which were neither sworn to nor affirmed under the penalty of perjury. These papers are insufficient to sustain defendant’s burden (see, Graves v Rochester Gen. Hosp., 135 AD2d 1130; Savage v Delacruz, 100 AD2d 707, 708; Ferguson v Temmons, 79 AD2d 1090, 1091). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J.— summary judgment.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and. Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rein v. Prescott, 149 A.D.2d 982, 543 N.Y.S.2d 352, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

149 A.D.2d 982 (Rein v. Prescott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. Temmons
79 A.D.2d 1090 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Savage v. Delacruz
100 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Graves v. Rochester General Hospital
135 A.D.2d 1130 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)