Rein v. Blanchard

353 So. 2d 190, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17194
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1977·No. No. GG-105·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal Howard E. Rein and the other members of the Civil Service Board of the City of Pensacola, Florida seek review of a writ of mandamus entered by a Circuit Judge construing Chapter 63-1775 Laws of Florida, as amended, and commanding the members of said Civil Service Board “to review the circumstances of discharge of petitioner Charles H. Blanchard of the City of Pensacola, Florida, and certify to the Pension Board of the City of Pensacola, Florida, the eligibility of said petitioner for pension benefits for a pension to which his period of service entitled him, effective to the date of said petitioner’s discharge by the Civil Service Board.”

We do not here determine whether or not said act or any amendment thereto is retroactive in application. We do hold, however, that under the facts of this case mandamus does not lie, therefore the peremptory writ here appealed is reversed.

REVERSED.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rein v. Blanchard, 353 So. 2d 190, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 17194 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

353 So. 2d 190 (Rein v. Blanchard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blanchard v. City of Pensacola
433 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)