Reimer v. Wenz
This text of 229 A.D. 732 (Reimer v. Wenz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consent in open court, order denying plaintiff’s motion for the entry of an interlocutory judgment, to appoint a referee to take and state the account between the parties, and to direct defendant, as receiver, to wind up the partnership, reversed and motion granted to the extent of directing the entry of an interlocutory judgment and the appointment of an official referee to take and state the account. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
229 A.D. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reimer-v-wenz-nyappdiv-1930.