Reiman v. Northern Zaleski Ltd.
This text of 282 A.D. 884 (Reiman v. Northern Zaleski Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mn an action for breach of contract, money had and received, and to set aside transfers in fraud of creditors, defendants appeal from an order granting in part plaintiff’s motion for examination of defendants before trial, and directing the production of books and records pursuant to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph (a) items 1(a) and 1(e), and (b) the place of examination and substituting therefor Special Term, Part II, Queens County, as the place of examination. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Examination as to the terms of plaintiff’s employment is unnecessary because the acts which give rise to plaintiff’s causes of action are not his employment, but those surrounding the termination of his employment. Item 1(e) is unnecessary because it is admitted in the pleadings. Examination before trial of a resident of this State must be either in the county where he resides, where he has an office, or where the action is pending. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 300.) Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
282 A.D. 884, 124 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reiman-v-northern-zaleski-ltd-nyappdiv-1953.