Reilly v. Vincent
This text of 50 A.D.2d 896 (Reilly v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to show cause why a certain check was not deposited to petitioner’s account, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 23, 1974, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The Court of Claims has jurisdiction over this claim, sounding in tort, for money damages (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subds 2, 4). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 A.D.2d 896, 377 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11796, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/reilly-v-vincent-nyappdiv-1975.