Reilly v. Vincent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Reilly v. Vincent

50 A.D.2d 896, 377 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11796

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1975·Published

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to show cause why a certain check was not deposited to petitioner’s account, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 23, 1974, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The Court of Claims has jurisdiction over this claim, sounding in tort, for money damages (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subds 2, 4). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to show cause why a certain check was not deposited to petitioner’s account, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated December 23, 1974, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs. The Court of Claims has jurisdiction over this claim, sounding in tort, for money damages (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subds 2, 4). Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Margett, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Reilly v. Vincent, 50 A.D.2d 896, 377 N.Y.S.2d 179, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11796 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

50 A.D.2d 896 (Reilly v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.