Reilly v. State

122 So. 3d 933, 2013 WL 5476581, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15547
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 2013·No. No. 1D13-2884·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sean P. Reilly seeks mandamus relief to compel the circuit court to rule on a motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). However, two direct appeals arising from the same case are currently pending before this court, and the circuit court is therefore divested of jurisdiction to consider the rule 3.800(a) motion at this point. See Campbell-Eley v. State, 763 So.2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (a trial court lacks jurisdiction to consider a defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence while a direct appeal is pending). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

THOMAS, WETHERELL, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reilly v. State, 122 So. 3d 933, 2013 WL 5476581, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 15547 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

122 So. 3d 933 (Reilly v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell-Eley v. State
763 So. 2d 539 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)